{"id":351353,"date":"2025-05-28T00:55:45","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T22:55:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sauldie.org\/de\/tool-test-kiroi-schritt-2-softwareauswahl-4\/"},"modified":"2025-05-28T00:55:45","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T22:55:45","slug":"tool-test-kiroi-step-2-software-selection-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sauldie.org\/en\/tool-test-kiroi-step-2-software-selection-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Tool test in KIROI step 2: How decision-makers choose AI tools"},"content":{"rendered":"

The path to the optimal selection of digital tools often begins with a well-structured Tool test<\/b>. This step plays a central role in the KIROI process, especially in the second step, where companies identify suitable solutions in a targeted and systematic manner. This is not just about technical features, but also about how tools can be integrated into everyday working life and what specific benefits they provide. A well-founded Tool test<\/b> supports decision-makers in creating a reliable basis for their decisions and effectively driving forward the digital transformation.<\/p>\n

Tool test in KIROI step 2: The structured selection process<\/h2>\n

The selection of suitable digital tools begins with a detailed needs analysis. For example, manufacturing companies examine early warning systems that recognise potential disruptions in production at an early stage. Marketing departments, on the other hand, test automation tools for monitoring the competition and optimising campaigns. Office organisation teams rely on tools that can be smoothly integrated into existing software landscapes and also meet data protection requirements.<\/p>\n

The Tool test<\/b> in KIROI step 2 is iterative: it not only serves to compare functions, but also to evaluate user-friendliness, scalability and process compatibility. In this way, companies ensure that the selected solutions bring practical benefits and are sustainable in everyday working life. One manufacturer from the mechanical engineering sector was able to Tool test<\/b> For example, we were able to identify a visual quality control system that significantly reduced error rates and relieved the strain on operators at the same time.<\/p>\n

Best practice: How companies implement the tool test in a targeted manner<\/h2>\n

Successful decisions start with clearly defined use cases and cross-functional teams that bring in different perspectives. For example, when testing AI-based risk analysis tools, a financial services provider can not only check their accuracy, but also ensure their integration into existing compliance systems. Similarly, a customer service provider evaluates tools in terms of their user-friendliness in direct dialogue with customers.<\/p>\n

BEST PRACTICE with one customer (name hidden due to NDA contract)<\/b> A planning tool was tested in KIROI step 2 at a medium-sized logistics company. The aim was to optimise supply chains with AI-supported route planning. The targeted tool test not only identified cost savings, but also showed that a certain complexity of the solution reduces the practical benefits. The findings were directly incorporated into the adaptation of the requirements, which strengthened acceptance among employees in the long term.<\/i><\/p>\n

Another important aspect is the documentation of all test results. This is the only way to utilise findings transparently and comprehensibly for later decisions. Marketing departments use this step to evaluate automation tools in terms of their efficiency in campaigns through realistic tests in live operation. The IT department of a healthcare provider also ensured that data protection and data security were perfectly complied with before a documentation tool was implemented.<\/p>\n

Important criteria for the evaluation in the tool test<\/h3>\n

In addition to the technical features, a practice-orientated selection takes particular account of:<\/p>\n