kiroi.org

AIROI - Artificial Intelligence Return on Invest
The AI strategy for decision-makers and managers

Business excellence for decision-makers & managers by and with Sanjay Sauldie

AIROI - Artificial Intelligence Return on Invest: The AI strategy for decision-makers and managers

5 April 2025

KIROI step 2: Tool test - How decision-makers test AI solutions

4.8
(1247)

The term Tooltest is at the centre of a key process stage with which decision-makers specifically test AI solutions for their suitability in practice. As part of KIROI step 2, the tool test offers a structured method for evaluating digital tools not only functionally, but also in terms of user-friendliness and integration. This phase supports companies in making well-founded decisions that contribute to the long-term success of using new AI systems.

The well-founded approach to tool testing

A successful tool test starts with a detailed analysis of individual requirements and a clear definition of use cases. This allows decision-makers to focus on practical aspects and make a targeted selection of potential AI tools. This is not just about technical features, but also about compatibility with existing systems and adaptability to operational processes.

In a manufacturing company, for example, a tool test can be used to evaluate early warning systems for machine faults. This can reduce downtimes and increase process quality. In a medium-sized service provider, the evaluation of an analysis tool provides impetus for marketing strategies by revealing competitive gaps in keyword coverage. Office organisation benefits from testing automated software that simplifies routine tasks and integrates seamlessly into existing office systems.

Practical examples for the tool test

BEST PRACTICE at a customer (name concealed due to NDA contract): The tool test was used in a manufacturing company to test an AI-supported maintenance system. The support provided by transruptions coaching enabled a clear formulation of objectives and helped to analyse the test results in a structured manner. This enabled technical challenges to be recognised at an early stage and adjustments to be made before the system went into series production.

In retail, a company uses tool tests to compare different e-commerce platforms in terms of performance and customer satisfaction. This test enabled targeted improvements to be implemented, which led to increased sales. In the healthcare sector, on the other hand, the testing of digital documentation systems led to an increase in efficiency and a reduction in errors in patient administration.

Success factors for an effective tool test

An effective tool test is not limited to a one-off evaluation, but is a dynamic, iterative process. The involvement of all relevant departments is essential: IT, management and operational teams work together to create realistic scenarios. This ensures meaningful test results and increases the acceptance of the new tools in everyday working life.

In addition, professional support, such as transruption coaching, is recommended. This helps to formulate clear objectives, define evaluation criteria and document the results transparently. The result is not an opaque „blind flight“, but a comprehensible path to a suitable solution. Many decision-makers report that these impulses in particular have a lasting motivating effect on employees and help to better integrate innovative technologies.

Practical tips for decision-makers in tool testing

1. specifically define your use cases and requirements before the test phase.

2. actively involve representatives from all relevant departments in the tests.

3. focus not only on technical functions, but also on usability and data protection.

4. document test results thoroughly to support later decisions.

5. use external support to professionally manage the process and gain impetus.

My analysis

The Tooltest in KIROI step 2 is an indispensable stage for checking digital tools specifically for their suitability. A systematic approach that takes both technical and organisational criteria into account can successfully support the introduction of AI solutions. Practical examples show that such tests provide impetus for process optimisation in a wide range of industries such as production, retail and healthcare. The involvement of all relevant stakeholders and professional support significantly increase transparency and acceptance. In this way, the tool test not only supports the selection, but also the sustainable implementation of new digital tools.

Further links from the text above:

[1] Tool test in KIROI step 2: How decision-makers find the best
[3] Tool testing for decision-makers: successfully utilising KIROI step 2
[5] Tool tests in KIROI step 2: How decision-makers test AI tools
[7] Tool test in KIROI step 2: How decision-makers test AI tools
[15] Tool test: How decision-makers master AI tools in KIROI Step 2

For more information and if you have any questions, please contact Contact us or read more blog posts on the topic Artificial intelligence here.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 4.8 / 5. Vote count: 1247

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Share on the web now:

Other content worth reading:

KIROI step 2: Tool test - How decision-makers test AI solutions

written by:

Keywords:

#compliance #DigitalTools #Ethical guidelines #KIEdecision maker #ki integration #Sustainability #Process optimisation #Tooltesting 1TP5Corporate culture #Chains of responsibility

Follow me on my channels:

Questions on the topic? Contact us now without obligation

Contact us
=
Please enter the result as a number.

More articles worth reading

Leave a comment